I would recommend 9.7p10
Be aware that you can only jump 2 versions… so it’s 9.1 to 9.3 to 9.5 to 9.7 😉
I would recommend a pause between each version, and get the latest patched version also…
I seem to remember one specific version where the cluster certificate in the downloaded ontap version was expired, which resulted in an upgrade of the cluster never completing… no downtime or anything, but NetApp support had to fix the cluster database… 😊
I have been working with NetApp for 15 years …
[View More]and never done a real production revert in my life 😉. But maybe I’m just lucky?
/Heino
I've got an AFF8020 running 9.1P10 and wondering whether I should target 9.6P10 or 9.7P10 as the destination version.
I'm aware that such an upgrade will require a hop to 9.3 first.
I'm also aware that reversion can not skip a release, which is a little scary. I *really* hope I don't have to revert
from 9.6 or 9.7 all the way back to 9.3 (3 or 4 hops).
What I'm looking for is advice on 9.6p10 vs. 9.7p10. Any horror stories of either release?
I'm leaning towards 9.7p10, just because it's more recent.
Fra: Toasters <toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net> på vegne af Brian Parent via Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net>
Dato: fredag, 5. februar 2021 kl. 19.22
Til: toasters(a)teaparty.net <toasters(a)teaparty.net>
Emne: <no subject>
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters(a)teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
[View Less]
Hey there,
we do operate a few EOL'ed devices in our labs (and as playground for the automation services, etc.) and from time to time, things break - very rarely, but they do.
I do have quite some hardware on stock here and I'm all set for exchanging almost anything that can break inside a filer (from disks to shelves to backplanes, cables, fans, PSUs, NVRAM batteries, etc.), but changing the motherboard proved difficult.
I cannot find a way to assign the old S/N to the new motherboard in …
[View More]order to be able to reuse the licenses we had on the (now dead) filer.
License transfers to other serial numbers are also not possible without active support contract.
Any idea how to make that happen?
Thanks,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
[View Less]
Just ran into an interesting bug in 9.3P17 (yes, I'm off support!)
and another 9.5P5 system which I thought I'd share.
Let's grab all the export policies on the system in CSV format to make
it easy to parse:
ntap1::> set -showseparator ","; export-policy show
Vserver Policy Name
--------------- -------------------
foo default
WTF? That's wierd? Let's try something else:
ntap1::> set -showseparator ","; export-policy show -fields …
[View More]vserver
,policyname
vserver,policyname,
Vserver,Policy Name,
foo,default,
Ah! Now we're getting what we want. Stupid annoying bug when you're
trying to write a perl script to pull out data. Can anyone confirm if
this is still there in the latest releases?
Hmm... poking at it some more... I suspect I'm forgetting that you
*must* specify the fields when changing the -showseparator to get
easier to parse output. But I still think this is a surprising
occurance, since it does include the field names, so there's no need
to actually specify them in the output.
Principal of least surprise and all that.
Cheers,
John
[View Less]
I've got an AFF8020 running 9.1P10 and wondering whether I should target 9.6P10 or 9.7P10 as the destination version.
I'm aware that such an upgrade will require a hop to 9.3 first.
I'm also aware that reversion can not skip a release, which is a little scary. I *really* hope I don't have to revert
from 9.6 or 9.7 all the way back to 9.3 (3 or 4 hops).
What I'm looking for is advice on 9.6p10 vs. 9.7p10. Any horror stories of either release?
I'm leaning towards 9.7p10, just because it's more …
[View More]recent.
--
Brian Parent
Information Technology Services Department
ITS Computing Infrastructure Operations Group
UC San Diego
(858) 534-6090
[View Less]
I have a 3240 cluster with node A running 8.2.5P5 and node B running
8.1.4P9. Node A was upgraded to 8.2.5P5 and giveback was performed from
node B. Takeover of node B by node A was performed, and both nodes are now
running on node A. But, node B was not upgraded to 8.2.5P5 before the
takeover and now when we attempt to giveback to node B so that it can be
upgraded, it panics.
So, node A running 8.2.5P5 in takeover mode. Node B running 8.1.4P9 has
been taken over by A. How can we get B …
[View More]upgraded to 8.2.5P5?
Thanks,
--Carl
[View Less]