Hi Mike,
Thanks, I had a similar issue with 1G copper SFPs in the past – but that doesn’t seem to apply here since the 40G ports are on an expansion slot and do not seem to be CNA capable:
*> cna_flash update all
NOTE: The flash update will take up to 30 minutes per update.
(Current 2 chip(s) in the system)
Do not interrupt power during the update, or you risk flash image corruption.
Version (5.0.2) is the same in flash and file
No update of flash is needed for port 0e.
Version (5.…
[View More]0.2) is the same in flash and file
No update of flash is needed for port 0g.
-> While the expansion ports are in slot 2.
Also, the upgrade to Ontap 9.1 did not solve the issue – will check the cables now when I’m in the datacenter.
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
Von: Mike Gossett [mailto:cmgossett@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Januar 2017 00:58
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com>
Cc: tmac <tmacmd(a)gmail.com>; toasters(a)teaparty.net
Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link
Just a thought-
I noticed that on a FAS2554, when trying to use 1G SFPs (copper) in the UTA ports, I had similar issues. I ended up having to apply a firmware update to the UTA2 system, IIRC, from maintenance mode. I have nothing that leads me to believe that is the case here, but it sounds somewhat close.
The updated firmware was actually on the system with the code it shipped with, but needed to be manually applied.
If all else fails, there's always a support ticket :)
HTH
Mike
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote:
Those are optical cables, that got shipped with the card and the transceivers.
According to HWU, those are the transceivers:
<< pic removed >>
They look exactly like these and HWU calls them X65402.
The connector looks exactly like the MPO connector which can also be seen in HWU and hast he cable number X66200-2 – so this is what I got:
X1144A Adapter
X65402 Transceivers
X66200-2 Cables
Should all play well with 9.1RC2 on the AFF-A300.
Since 9.1 has already been released, I’ll upgrade this system to 9.1 and see if that changes anything – maybe there’s a reason why they call it RC ☺
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com<mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com>]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 14:34
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>>
Cc: toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>
Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link
OK, a little confused now. Are you trying to use copper or optical?
According to HWU, the X1144A as QSFP+ slots and the cable ends look identical to the SAS cables.
The NetApp end should be any supported copper cable with a QSFP+ end or an optical transciever (X65402A, mfg 332-00389).
The optical transciver will have the QSFP+ going into the filer and exposing the MPO end for your optical cable
Since it looks like you are trying to use Optical, are you *sure* the optical transcivers are the right ones for that card?
--tmac
Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant
Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam<https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>
I Blog at TMACsRack<https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote:
That’s the 2-port 40G card with QSFPs and those funny new cables, no breakout cables.
http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-uiigcj2/product_images/uploaded_images/mtp-ca…
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com<mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com>]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 13:40
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>>
Cc: toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>
Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link
Curious...are you using it as a two-port 40Gb card or using the breakout cable?
--tmac
Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant
Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam<https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>
I Blog at TMACsRack<https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote:
Good question – I’m using the QSFPs and the cables that came with the cards, so I’m positive that those should be supported.
But I’m trying to find out.
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com<mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com>]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 13:04
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>>
Cc: toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>
Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link
what is the cable that you are using? Anything supported?
[Inline image 1][Inline image 2]
--tmac
Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant
Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam<https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>
I Blog at TMACsRack<https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I’ve just installed those fancy X1144A cards in one of our AFF300 systems and it seems they’re getting recognized properly, but I’m not able to get a link on them.
sysconfig says:
slot 2: 40 Gigabit Ethernet Controller XL710 QSFP+
e2a MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 (auto-unknown-down)
e2e MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c9 (auto-unknown-down)
SAN01::> net port show -port e2*
(network port show)
Node: SAN01-01
Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
Node: SAN01-02
Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
4 entries were displayed.
For testing purposes, I did connect e2a on node1 to e2a on node 2 and I already tried exchanging the QSFPs and cables, but still no dice.
Any idea what could be wrong here?
According to HWU, the minimum required OS version is 9.1RC2, which is exactly what is installed currently:
SAN01::> version
NetApp Release 9.1RC2: Thu Nov 24 08:59:46 UTC 2016
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net>
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net>
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
[View Less]
Hi people
Just out of idle curiosity, am I the only netapp admin who does
not know about the super secret flags to allow snapmirror to actually
work at reasonable speed?
We were running 8.3.2 cluster mode, and spent weeks looking into why our
snapmirrors to our remote site ran so slowly. We were often 2 days behind
over 40G networks. Obviously, we focussed on network
issues. And we wasted a lot of time. We could make no sense of the problem
at all since sometimes it appears to work ok, the …
[View More]later the transfers
slowed to a crawl.
We eventually opened a case and it did not take to long for a reply which
basically said "why don't you just disable the global snapmirror throttle."
I had already looked into such a beast, but found nothing.
As you may or may not know, it turns out to be a per node setting. The name of the
flag is repl_throttle_enable. Of course, you can only see such flags or change
them on the node, in privileged mode.
Setting the flag to 0 immediately (and I do mean immediately) allowed our
snapmirrors to run at the speed you might expect over 40G. Instead of
taking 2 days, snapmirror updates now took 2 hours.
We have since upgraded to 9.1. The flags reverted to on, but again can be
set to off. I think there is a documented global snapmirror throttle
option in 9.1, but I have not looked into that yet.
Are we the only site in the world to have seen this issue?
We use snapmirror DR for all our mirrors which may be a factor.
As I said, just idle curiousity and maybe helping someone avoid the
time wasting we had.
Regards,
pdg
Peter Gray Ph (direct): +61 2 4221 3770
Information Management & Technology Services Ph (switch): +61 2 4221 3555
University of Wollongong Fax: +61 2 4229 1958
Wollongong NSW 2522 Email: pdg(a)uow.edu.au
Australia URL: http://pdg.uow.edu.au
[View Less]
Hi there,
I have two filers (1x FAS2240 and 1x FAS2650) and both have the system attention LED lit and I have no idea why.
`System health status show` as well as config advisor are both A-OK and there are no visible indicators why this LED is still lit.
Any idea how to find out the root cause of this LED on the front bezel or how I can check or maybe reset the status of the LED through CLI?
Thanks,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: …
[View More]AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
[View Less]
Hi,
I've just installed those fancy X1144A cards in one of our AFF300 systems and it seems they're getting recognized properly, but I'm not able to get a link on them.
sysconfig says:
slot 2: 40 Gigabit Ethernet Controller XL710 QSFP+
e2a MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 (auto-unknown-down)
e2e MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c9 (auto-unknown-down)
SAN01::> net port show -port e2*
(network port show)
Node: SAN01-01
…
[View More] Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
Node: SAN01-02
Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
4 entries were displayed.
For testing purposes, I did connect e2a on node1 to e2a on node 2 and I already tried exchanging the QSFPs and cables, but still no dice.
Any idea what could be wrong here?
According to HWU, the minimum required OS version is 9.1RC2, which is exactly what is installed currently:
SAN01::> version
NetApp Release 9.1RC2: Thu Nov 24 08:59:46 UTC 2016
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
[View Less]
Yes, already tried that.
Here’s the –instance output of those ports:
SAN01::*> net port show -port e2* -instance
(network port show)
Node: SAN01-01
Port: e2a
Link: down
MTU: 1500
Auto-Negotiation Administrative: true
Auto-Negotiation Operational: true
Duplex Mode Administrative: auto
…
[View More] Duplex Mode Operational: half
Speed Administrative: auto
Speed Operational: 10
Flow Control Administrative: full
Flow Control Operational: none
MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8
Up Administrative: true
Autorevert Delay: -
Port Type: physical
Interface Group Parent Node: -
Interface Group Parent Port: -
Distribution Function: -
Create Policy: -
Parent VLAN Node: -
Parent VLAN Port: -
VLAN Tag: -
Remote Device ID: -
IPspace Name: Default
DCB State: incapable
Broadcast Domain: -
MTU Administrative: 1500
Port Health Status: -
Ignore Port Health Status: false
Port Health Degraded Reasons: -
[…]
Node: SAN01-02
Port: e2a
Link: down
MTU: 1500
Auto-Negotiation Administrative: true
Auto-Negotiation Operational: true
Duplex Mode Administrative: auto
Duplex Mode Operational: half
Speed Administrative: auto
Speed Operational: 10
Flow Control Administrative: full
Flow Control Operational: none
MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:8f:a0
Up Administrative: true
Autorevert Delay: -
Port Type: physical
Interface Group Parent Node: -
Interface Group Parent Port: -
Distribution Function: -
Create Policy: -
Parent VLAN Node: -
Parent VLAN Port: -
VLAN Tag: -
Remote Device ID: -
IPspace Name: Default
DCB State: incapable
Broadcast Domain: -
MTU Administrative: 1500
Port Health Status: -
Ignore Port Health Status: false
Port Health Degraded Reasons: -
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
Von: CPO [mailto:cavinoquin@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 14:18
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com>
Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link
Did you try to status-admin-up the interface?
On Jan 27, 2017 4:20 AM, "Alexander Griesser" <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I’ve just installed those fancy X1144A cards in one of our AFF300 systems and it seems they’re getting recognized properly, but I’m not able to get a link on them.
sysconfig says:
slot 2: 40 Gigabit Ethernet Controller XL710 QSFP+
e2a MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 (auto-unknown-down)
e2e MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c9 (auto-unknown-down)
SAN01::> net port show -port e2*
(network port show)
Node: SAN01-01
Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
Node: SAN01-02
Speed(Mbps) Health
Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status
--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------
e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 -
4 entries were displayed.
For testing purposes, I did connect e2a on node1 to e2a on node 2 and I already tried exchanging the QSFPs and cables, but still no dice.
Any idea what could be wrong here?
According to HWU, the minimum required OS version is 9.1RC2, which is exactly what is installed currently:
SAN01::> version
NetApp Release 9.1RC2: Thu Nov 24 08:59:46 UTC 2016
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net>
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
[View Less]
Has anyone here used XCP for Isilon migration, any experiences you can share?
Thanks! _________________________________Jeff MohlerTech Yahoo, Storage Architect, Principal
Hello
I'm trying to find an official list of which hardware supports the new 9.1
Netapp Volume Encryption (NVE) feature. I've checked HWU and can't see
anything that shows NVE compatibility. I've also tried IMT but I've never
been able to get along with that tool.
Specifically, I'm trying to find out if the FAS2500 series or new FAS2650
platforms support this feature.
I've listened to TechOnTap podcast #59 in which the speakers discuss NVE
but I'm now looking for the "official" …
[View More]documentation on hardware support.
Any pointers to the right docs would be greatly appreciated!
Kind regards
Steve
[View Less]
Hi All,
I've noticed the following on cDOT 9.0 production cluster:
na201::> df -h vol_imgstore03
Filesystem total used avail capacity Mounted
on Vserver
/vol/vol_imgstore03/ 90TB 60TB 29TB 67%
/vol_imgstore03 na201svm-nfs10g-02
/vol/vol_imgstore03/.snapshot
0B 0B 0B 0%
/vol_imgstore03/.snapshot na201svm-nfs10g-02
2 entries were displayed.
na201::> vol show …
[View More]vol_imgstore03 -fields files
vserver volume files
------------------ -------------- --------
na201svm-nfs10g-02 vol_imgstore03 59999998
So, volume's size is 90TB and its current max inodes possible is ~ 60M
na201::> vol size vol_imgstore03 +10g -vserver na201svm-nfs10g-02
vol size: Volume "na201svm-nfs10g-02:vol_imgstore03" size set to 90.01t.
Now, I just added 10G to the volume, expecting it's going to increase
the "files" value respectively:
na201::> vol show vol_imgstore03 -fields files
vserver volume files
------------------ -------------- --------
na201svm-nfs10g-02 vol_imgstore03 59999998
However it's not the case.
Anyone knows what I'm missing here?
Cheers,
Vladimir
[View Less]
Hi,
o a V6000 with Ontap 8.2 7Mode a series of LUNs have been configured from an EMC CX4 system.
It happened that randomly a couple of LUN fail on the same raid group of the CX4.
The controller loose its aggregate that goes in degraded mode and a takeover start to the other node.
The other node after takeover attempt to put this aggregate online but if fails because one of its lun is still missed.
This panic all the systems and this should be avoided.
There are other third party arrays …
[View More]virtualized that should continue to work.
Is it possible to exclude from takeover actions only one aggregate (I think no), why the remaining node panic?
regards
[View Less]