Hi,

 

While I wouldn’t disagree that it’s a good product, having run GX, then 8.0C then 8.1C I’d argue that in a 2 node configuration C mode would be less reliable with little benefit over 7 mode at this point in time.

 

In fact, I’d probably wager that there will be a minimal performance degradation too. Less speed and reliability is a hard sell and that’s before you even think about how difficult it’d be to move to C mode without buying more hardware.

 

Darren

 

 

 

From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Bohemen, Anton van
Sent: 18 June 2012 10:56
To: toasters@teaparty.net
Subject: RE: Cluster mode - Market vs field

 

Well, to be honest, I think it is time to (at least) start thinking about moving to cluster mode. A FAS2220 is a bit on the positive side as you can’t do SAN with it in C-Mode, but a 2240 can, so then you are fine. I’ve been testing quite extensive with the simulator and it actually works fine. A bit to my surprise as well I must admit, I was just as skeptical as you all. The concepts are great and the VServer virtualization layer is a great addition to the WAFL storage virtualization layer. VServers work so much better than vFilers and with c-mode you get all the scalability advantages you need.

 

So, I’m not surprised all the commercial people at NetApp and partners are pushing to C-Mode. If you have a technology refresh in a few years, you should definitely consider it. If you have one this year, I’m not really sure yet. Not because not all features are supported in c-mode (yet), but right now it is quite a steep learning curve if you’re used to 7-mode. You need to re-think most of your storage setup but once you do, I think c-mode will fit a lot of environments.

 

Bottom line: start reading and testing, I think c-mode actually is a good product.

 

Regards,

 

Anton

 

 

From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Blackmor, Chris
Sent: zondag 17 juni 2012 17:45
To: Milazzo Giacomo
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Subject: Re: Cluster mode - Market vs field

 

They can say that all they want but I think NA has had way too many missteps with C-mode to be pushing it down anyone's 

Sent from my iPhone

 


On Jun 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, "Milazzo Giacomo" <G.Milazzo@sinergy.it> wrote:

Hi all,

 

I’ve recently attended an official event where people from NetApp in few words said:

 

DOT 8 7-mode has done its time, it’s over, it has been a great os but It’s now time to move and push DOT 8 Cluster Mode, everytime, everywhere…” and this also if with a simple two node HA system, including 2220!

 

What do you think about? Also let us assume that cluster mode can (I add ‘theoretically’) do all what 7 mode does, don’t you think that is quite premature to trumpet this out?

 

Regards,

 

_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

 

To report this email as spam click here.

This e-mail is personal. For our full disclaimer, please visit www.centric.eu/disclaimer.

 



Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
More information can be found at www.csr.com. Follow CSR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CSR_PLC and read our blog at www.csr.com/blog