We're running two 7-mode FAS6240 pairs on 8.1.4P1 with numerous CIFS
shares (300+ volumes, ~400TB of space) and I have not heard a single
case of this causing problems since we upgraded a while back.
--
Mike Garrison
> _______________________________________________
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Philbert Rupkins
<philbertrupkins@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Toasters,
>
> Has anybody upgraded to ONTAP 8.1.4 and made considerations for the new way
> ONTAP handles UTF-16 Supplementary characters? If so, how did you go about
> evaluating your exposure to issues with the new way the UTF-16 Supplementary
> characters are handled?
>
> The 8.1.4 release notes state the following:
>
> -------------------
>
> Change in how Data ONTAP handles file names containing UTF-16
>
> supplementary characters
>
>
>
> Starting with Data ONTAP 8.1.4, there is a change in how Data ONTAP handles
> file names containing UTF-16 supplementary characters that you must be aware
> of if your environment uses such file names. Unicode character data is
> typically represented in Windows applications using the 16-bit Unicode
> Transformation Format (UTF-16). Characters in the basic multilingual plane
> (BMP) of UTF-16 are represented as single 16-bit code units. Characters in
> the additional 16 supplementary planes are represented as pairs of 16-bit
> code units that are referred to as surrogate pairs. When you create file
> names on the storage system that contain supplementary characters, Data
> ONTAP checks the surrogate pairs. If they are valid, Data ONTAP accepts the
> file name. If they are invalid, Data ONTAP now rejects the file name and
> returns an invalid file name error.
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Any thoughts or guidance would be appreciated. I also have a ticket with
> NetApp support. The first gentlemen I spoke with said he didnt know much
> about this issue despite his having worked with several customers running
> 8.1.4. He doesnt have any good recommendations for assesing our
> environment to exposure to UTF-16 Supplementary characters and thinks it is
> generally a low risk concern.
>
> Thanks!
> -Phil
>
> Toasters mailing list
> Toasters@teaparty.net
> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
>