To clarify this further:

I _believe_ you can make use of VSM, then implement QSM\SV, but you would end up losing the existing snapvault relationships.

I’m not so sure the LREP is much of an improvement on this.

I hope I’m wrong.

Glenn

---

From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:13 PM
To: Owens, Jeff; toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Snapvault question

The only way I know of doing a baseline snapshot with QSM\SnapVault would be utilizing LREP.

There are no snapshots at all in common??

Glenn

---

From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Owens, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:20 PM
To: toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: Snapvault question

Question for you guys.
I am snapvaulting data from a couple of FAS940's over to an R200.

I have lost one of my baseline snapshots on the primary filer and am unable to resync that snapvault since there is no baseline snapshot to reference from.

Is there any way to create another baseline snapshot ?

Jeff