I'm liking the
thread that John Stewart started about his filer replacement, so I decided to
start my own.
We too are
faced with replacing our NetApp filers this year. We have and F720
(cifs file shares) and an F810 (cifs and iscsi). Both of these filers are
maxed out both in disk space and processor. We had NetApp come up with a
solution for us to replace these and the proposal is attractive. They put
together a 3020 system for us that should meet both of our storage and
processing needs for at least the next 2 years. So we budgeted for the
replacement. Then the unthinkable happened...
My boss received a
postcard from a company called Pillar Data. He brought the postcard to me
and said, "we should look at what these guys have." The rest is
history. For those of you not familiar with Pillar Data, it's a startup of
Larry Ellison's (the ORACLE Larry Ellison.) They have a really neat
product, and their QOS is quite impressive. But I don't think that their
product is mature enough yet for prime time. After spending some time with
their engineers and traveling to the Enterprise Technology Center in Atlanta to
demo one of these solutions, I found some chinks in their armor. I won't
go into the details here, but if anyone wants to know what I've learned about
them, I'll be happy to share that information.
So this leads me to
my question. Has anyone heard of Pillar Data and if so I was wondering if
you shared my opinion (or not) of their product? I want to stick with
the NetApp solution that was proposed, so I'm looking for ammunition to back up
my argument.
Cheers.
Luther L. Allin IV, MCSE,
ICSA
Network Systems Engineer
Miller & Martin PLLC
832 Georgia
Avenue, Suite 1000
Chattanooga, TN 37402
lallin@millermartin.com
(423)
785-8381 (Direct)
(423) 321-1678
(Fax)
Atlanta-Chattanooga-Nashville