According to SME documentation you should not use Incremental backup when SME is active. You may use Copy or Differential.

С уважением / With best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüβen

---
Andrey Borzenkov
Senior system engineer

---

From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Milazzo Giacomo
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NetApp list
Subject: SnapManager for Exchange and other backup software issue

Hi

I’ve an Exchange 2003 server mounted on NetApp iSCSI LUNs and managed by SnapManager for Exchange for its backups. SME does every night a full backup with a daily model.

Further there are another Backup Exec 11d media server that perform an historical disk backup using the usual method of daily incremental and a weekly full.

It happens (I know there’s something wrong on SME backup type) that the BackupExec daily (incrememental) jobs fail with the message that “no logs found because they have been deleted by some other process”. I’ve checked the Exchange log LUNs and it seems that, nevetheless the BE starts at 11 pm before the SME that starts at 03:00 am the transaction logs of Exchange are deleted causing the fail of the BE job.

Is there a better way to setup the SME backup leaving BE to perform the right incremental backup and leaving to BE the job to delete the unneeded logs?

Thanks in advance.               

Note: I use the new Exchange backup mode offered by BE11d, so that the backup of the information store db and logs avoiding the use of the traditional brick level method.

Da: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] Per conto di David McWilliams
Inviato: lunedì 14 gennaio 2008 20.00
A: NetApp list
Oggetto: Weird CIFS problem

I'm domain admin, and I'm accessing a share on my filer \\filer1\tdrive (/vol/vol0/tdrive). It is a seperate qtree, the only perms on the share are everyone/ full control. I even added a domain/administrator full control entry. I can see the top level of sub-dirs, bt I cannot go any deeper.

Does this make sense, or am I missing something?

--
Sláinte,

David

Get a safer, faster, better web browser @
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/