I think you'll not see difference between native dumps and NDMP. Indeed, NDMP can ben seen as some kind of "remote control", so using NDMP to make backup with a Filer actually implies using dump. So NDMP is, for its most part, a mean to control dump operation, plus, and that's the added value, getting a catalog of the files backed up to easily recover them.
For further info regarding how to tune tape backup, see here : http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3066.html#6.
"Duncan Greenwood" <duncan.greenwood@btinternet.com> Sent by: owner-toasters@mathworks.com
26/09/2003 19:54
To: <toasters@mathworks.com>
cc:
Subject: Dump performance
Boring I know, but I'd be interested to learn what kind of backup performance people
are getting for Windows/CIFS shares. I'm particularly thinking of home and shared
directories with millions of small files - the usual junk that accumulates on these
types of shares with hundreds of users.
I've seen amazing performance from dumps of Oracle datafiles, in the order of
90MB/s to three fibre-attached LTO-1s from an F840, but I know many small files
will reduce thruput significantly. The question is how much and what would
you do differently ?
I'd be grateful for any numbers people could share. We'll probably use NDMP but
I guess simple dumps would give a similar performance.
Thks in advance.
D
#
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003