I just tried NFSv2, similar results. Same deadly embrace of request/reply which is death with a link with latency.For this current test case this took over 5 minutes to copy 11MB of data in 600 files.For referenceNFS (WAN 20ms) to NFS (WAN 20ms): 5 minutesNFS (WAN 20 ms) to local disk: 50 secondsLocal disk to NFS (WAN 20ms ): 3 minutes 50 secondsLocal disk to local disk: 0.285 secondsNFS (LAN 1ms) to NFS (LAN 1ms): 5 seconds[I see that Peter also added data. This is a bit of throwback for me, I've been around long enough to deal with the fun Usenet spool directories and joys of lots of small files]The irony here is all I want is to make a copy of a directory which would be a trivial operation on the filer itself, I just need another reference to the directory. The filer can make the copy when data is modified. I'm wondering if I can do this with the OnTap API (I don't know about the APIs yet). The other possible work around is using a host that is on the same LAN as the filer to do the copies. I just can't believe that there isn't a simple solution to this.
Thanks everyone for the ideas and information.arnoldOn Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Mike Horwath <drechsau@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you require NFSv3?
Why not try NFSv2 - that will bypass the multitude of *ATTR calls going on a bit and may be better.
Only testing will tell, of course.
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters