I thought it was per HA-pair since those are the ones actually talking to the disks.
Someone can certainly correct me on that....but on the surface, that sounds incorrect (ACP the same across 4 nodes, not a HA pair)


--tmac

Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant

Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam

I Blog at TMACsRack




On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com> wrote:

Yah, I’d love to stay with OOB if possible, but AFAIK, you’re not allowed to mix ACP modes within a 4-node cluster f.ex. and I have to add a pair of AFF-A300s to this existing 2-node cluster and they do not have OOB-ACP anymore :-/

Will try to revert on the second controller, let’s see if that helps. Can’t hurt.

 

Alexander Griesser

Head of Systems Operations

 

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

 

E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com

Web: http://www.anexia-it.com

 

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler

Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

 

Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2017 19:28


An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Re: Switching to ACP inband connectivity

 

Well, thats a bummer!

I was fooling around on 9.0. The shipping version for ACP was 2.09, I was able to go back.

I would say...don't spend a lot of time with it. Your best bet is to simply leave ACP out-of-band.

 

I was not at all successful in doing anything until I got the FW back to 2.09.

 

I guess you could try running the "storage download acp –R" on both nodes to make sure?


--tmac

 

Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant

Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam

I Blog at TMACsRack

 

 

 

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com> wrote:

The thing is, they wanted to close the issue already telling me to subscribe to the BURT and get the info from there once it’s solved.

Anyways, I talked with support on the phone and he was reading your instructions down there and said that we should try that.

 

I’m not really sure how to downgrade ACP to a specific version, I’ve downloaded 2.09 and installed it, but it’s not really using it for the installation.

What I can do is I can revert to the version shipped with Ontap 9.1P2, which is what I did now by running:

 

storage download acp –R

 

but it did only install FW 2.10 again, but afterwards, it looked like this:

 

Node               Module Name        State

-----------------  -----------------  ----------------------

nodeA            1.22.B             firmware-update-required

                   1.22.A             firmware-update-required

                   2.11.A             active

                   2.11.B             firmware-update-required

                   2.14.B             active

                   2.14.A             active

                   2.12.A             active

                   2.12.B             firmware-update-required

                   2.13.A             active

                   2.13.B             firmware-update-required

                   1.21.B             active

                   1.21.A             active

nodeB         1.22.B             firmware-update-required

                   1.22.A             firmware-update-required

                   2.11.A             active

                   2.11.B             firmware-update-required

                   2.14.B             active

                   2.14.A             active

                   2.12.A             active

                   2.12.B             firmware-update-required

                   2.13.A             active

                   2.13.B             firmware-update-required

                   1.21.B             active

                   1.21.A             active

24 entries were displayed.

 

So I thought let’s do this again and it will fix the other half of the ACPs too, but it didn’t.

But at least half of them are fixed now J

 

Best,

 

Alexander Griesser

Head of Systems Operations

 

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

 

E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com

Web: http://www.anexia-it.com

 

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler

Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

 

Von: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] Im Auftrag von Alexander Griesser
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 19:20
An: tmac <tmacmd@gmail.com>
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: AW: Switching to ACP inband connectivity

 

Yah, no worries, I have time and endurance for things like that J No rush here on my end.

 

Alexander Griesser

Head of Systems Operations

 

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

 

E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com

Web: http://www.anexia-it.com

 

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler

Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

 

Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 19:17
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Re: Switching to ACP inband connectivity

 

Yep. internal burt, but a burt none the less. save them from digging it up.

Let us know how you make out. I was under a crunch putting a system into production and could not fool around with it any more.

 

Thanks


--tmac

 

Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant

Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam

I Blog at TMACsRack

 

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com> wrote:

Alright, thanks – I’m opening a case now, cannot see the details of the BURT, though, but will refer support to it.

 

Best,

 

Alexander Griesser

Head of Systems Operations

 

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

 

E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com

Web: http://www.anexia-it.com

 

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler

Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

 

Von: tmac [mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 14:05
An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Re: Switching to ACP inband connectivity

 

I have seen this! Support was unable to reproduce for me. I will dig up a case number later if you like.

 

I will give you two options:

1. Open a support case with netapp and refer to the BURT 1050364 / Case 2006580487 

2. The ultimate fix that I did was this:

-> Downgrade *all* IOM firmware to 2.09. Wait for it to stabilize.

-> Convert to in-band. Wait for it to stabilize and confirm IN-Band

-> Convert to out-of-band and upgrade to 2.10 firmware.

-> Wait for it to stabilize and then convert to out-of-band

 

I got to believe there may be some race condition where the 2.08 -> 2.10 firmware is not completing 100%.

If you use the out-of-band, all looks ok, but switch to in-band and not so much.

 

The thought is something special happens on 2.09 that fixes everything allowing the upgrade to 2.10

 

If possible, please open a case and refer to the data above. I think it is in everyones best interest NetApp gets to the bottom of this to fix.

 

Thanks

 


--tmac

 

Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant

Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam

I Blog at TMACsRack

 

 [ stripping my own post due to size limitations on this mailing list ]