may i know what do you mean by much worse ?

David Le Blanc wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 06:54:17PM +0200, Stephane Bentebba wrote:
  
i confirm, its normal,
this way you know throught wich interface someone go over its quota (if 
you care)

Piotr KUCHARSKI wrote:

    
Is it only me who is bothered by this:

Fri May 23 17:12:52 CEST [quota.softlimit.exceeded:notice]: Threshold 
   exceeded for user 22638, tree 0 on volume v
Fri May 23 17:18:12 CEST [GbE-II/e8:notice]: uid 22638: disk quota 
   exceeded on volume v.  Additional warnings will be suppressed for 
   approximately 60 minutes or until either a 'quota resize' is performed.

While first message is quite right, the second one has 
"GbE-II/e8" instead of "quota.hardlimit.exceeded" or similar.

I've contacted NetApp about this and they just stated "nothing
to worry about, it is normal".

p.

PS Instead of GbE-II/e8 can be any of your primary network interfaces name.
      

Yeah...
Sure, its annoying and "normal", but I've seen MUCH worse. ;-)

--
Dave Le Blanc
Unix Systems Administrator
Computer Science Department
California Institute of Technology
(626)395-2402

  

-- 
-- jetez un oeil ici http://www.sensiva.com/ --
--  have a look here http://www.sensiva.com/ --