I just installed a new Filer with 72GB BCS drives and
they formatted to 68GB. FYI: The only ones that format differently
(ZCS vs BCS) are the 36GB disks.
Need to be careful here.
Ex: A 36GB BCS drive can
not “hot Spare” for a 36GB ZCS drive as the BCS drive formats to a lower
capacity.
Tom’s math below is accurate, + or – a tad. Nicely done J.
Todd Phillips
Sr. Systems Engineer
Integrated Archive Systems, Inc.
Ph: (650)
390-9995
Direct: (650)
528-4687
Cell: (415)
297-5762
Integrated Archive Systems (IAS) is the leading
provider of Storage, Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions. We have extensive
experience and expertise in Server High Availability (HA), Clustering, RAID,
NAS & SAN, Disaster Recovery & Backup Hardware and Software
integration.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Strange, Steve
[mailto:Steve.Strange@netapp.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001
11:56 AM
To: 'Tom Yergeau'; Geoff Hardin;
toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Real vs Raw disk
space
> 73 GB
disks "right sized" to 68000 MB (with zoned checksums.. anyone know
if that's the same with block checksums?)
For 73 GB
drives, the "right-sized" size is indeed the same for both zone and
block checksums.
For 36 GB
disks, there's a difference of 1GB between zone and block checksum
right-sizings.
Steve
-----Original
Message-----
From: Tom Yergeau
[mailto:yergeau@speakeasy.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001
10:59 AM
To: Geoff Hardin;
toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: Re: Real vs Raw disk
space
73 GB disks "right sized" to
68000 MB (with zoned checksums.. anyone know if that's the same with block
checksums?)
Since you can't use 14 disks and still
have a spare, I'm doing this with one seven disk set and one six disk set.
(68000 MB * 7) - 68000 MB (parity) =
408000
(68000 MB * 6) - 68000 MB (parity) =
340000
408000 MB + 340000 MB = 748000 MB
748000 MB * 0.9 = 673200 MB (lose 10% to
WAFL)
673200 MB * (1 GB / 1024 MB) = 657.42 GB
So... that
would be 657.42 GB usable, assuming no snap reserve.
However, I think if you're buying a DS14
you'll get block checksum disks, which might be right sized to a different
size, in which case it would be a different answer. :)
MD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Hardin" <geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com>
To: "toasters" <toasters@mathworks.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: Real vs Raw disk space
Toasters,
We are looking at purchasing some new DS14 shelves with 72 GB
disks.
In order to properly forecast our disk space growth, I was wondering if
anyone out there had taken a look at the difference between real and
usable disk space realized with these new shelves and drives.
Basically, our environment is as follows: DS14 Shelf with 14 72 GB
disks (1 RAID group of 8 disks, 1 RAID group of 6 disks), attached to a
filer running DOT 6.1R1P1. We will have 1 spare disk and no snap
reserve.
Geoff Hardin
geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com