Hi Steve,

 

If you have a valid support contract with NetApp I highly recommend you open a support case. Note, they probably won’t do much without a perfstat taken when you’re experiencing the problem. Therefore I suggest pre-empting this by downloading the perfstat tool at http://support.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/perfstat/ and have it ready in case the problem reappears.

 

There are a number of things that could be causing this. I would take a stab that the Kahuna processor is running through the roof, causing disk latency to be well in excess of the 20ms (you never what to reach). Some possible causes are:

·         Not enough spindles to serve the IO demand on the FAS.

·         Block misalignment, effectively doubling your IO usage.

·         CPU running too hot – can be caused by SnapMirror jobs, Dedupe, deswizzling, etc

·         Large CIFS directories have been known to cause this, although I don’t think you’re running CIFS.

 

All in all if your system is sized correctly, and you don’t have bock misalignment, you *shouldn’t* have problems with your system. The FAS6040 is a powerful box, something as simple as adding more spindles or introducing FlashCache should reduce this problem from reoccurring. Alternatively try moving some of the load to the partner controller, assuming that controller is under less load.

 

I’d also suggest you check out the mbralign tool at http://support.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/mbralign/ to check alignment issues in your VMware environment.

 

-Jonathon

 

 

 

From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Fletcher Cocquyt
Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2012 11:57 PM
To: Steve Losen
Cc: toasters@teaparty.net
Subject: Re: Diagnosing outage on FAS6040 running 8.0.1 7-mode

 

Hi Steve,

 

1) Use netapp support - ask specifically if there are any relevant known bugs in your 8.0.1 version - ask for a reply by a certain time

2) Use performance advisor to help deconstruct where the finite number of IOPs are going: http://www.vmadmin.info/2010/07/vmware-and-netapp-deconstructing.html

2a) Do the disk busy view spikes strongly correlate to the latency view spikes ?  

 

 

2b) Use PA to see your base line "normal" IOPS per aggr, also use the latency per IOPS chart to calculate your AGGRs IOPS capacity @ 20ms latency (VMs don't like much more than 20ms at peak)

3) Check unaligned IO is contributing to the latency spike by tracking partial writes: http://www.vmadmin.info/2010/07/quantifying-vmdk-misalignment.html 

 

 




 

On May 24, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Steve Losen wrote:




Hello Toasters,

We had an incident where a FAS6040 running 8.0.1 gave very
slow response to a variety of requests.  This resulted in
a bunch of Linux VMs experiencing failed disk I/O requests,
which resulted in corrupted local Linux filesystems.  One
Linux VM logged that it waited 180 sec. for a disk I/O to
complete.

The filer did not reboot, and recovered on its own, but we
are very interested in figuring out what happened and if we
can avoid it (known bug?, should we upgrade ONTAP?)

This 6040 does a variety of jobs -- NFS server for a Communigate Pro
email system, NFS volumes for VMWARE, and it even has a few FC
SAN LUNs used by sharepoint.  In general it does not appear to be
overloaded.  It's been up for over 300 days with no problems.
The CF partner filer experienced no problems at that time and it
also holds VMWARE volumes and mail volumes.

At the time of the outage the /etc/messages file indicated a slow
NFS response (93 sec) to one of the Communigate servers.  It also
indicated that a FC LUN was reset by the sharepoint server.  I'm
guessing due to delayed response.  The mail and sharepoint
volumes are in the same aggregate.  I see three resets for the
LUN in /etc/messages.

I looked in /etc/log/ems at about the time of the outage
(Tue May 22 17:30 EDT)  I see that a raid scrub of a raid
group in the mail/sharepoint aggregate completed with no errors.
I also see wafl_cp_toolong_warning_1 and wafl_cp_slovol_warning_1
for a different aggregate (which contains VMs).  I see several
of these, which I presume are caused by slow completion of CPs.

I don't know if these caused the problem or were caused by the
problem.

Anyone have any suggestions for further investigation or diagnosis?
Any other logs to look at?  Everything is fine now and has been
running fine since the outage.

Thanks,

Steve Losen   scl@virginia.edu    phone: 434-924-0640

University of Virginia               ITC Unix Support


_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters