Spares not only cross shelves they even cross
FCAL adapters if you have shelves on different FCAL HBAs.
A single volume would have to lose two disks
simultaneously or two disks after the first rebult in order to lose data with
only one spare.
If it lost one disk, then shortly thereafter
another disk, then having a second spare would not help as the first one would
still be rebuilding and you'd lose the volume.
If you lose one disk, rebuild, and lose another
disk, you're still intact but in degraded mode and vulnerable. Having a
second spare would be helpful. But the odds of losing two disks, the
second one after the first one rebuilt but before NetApp got you a replacement
4 hrs or the next day, seems
low.
If you have two spares per filer like Sam
mentioned, you're covered anyway since hot spares are global to the entire
filer.
Gosh this sounds convoluted! :-)
MD
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 4:35
PM
Subject: RE: # of volumes
Well if you have a 14 disk shelf, and two volumes, then each volume
could have a disk fail on top of one more that the spare would cover.
But yeah, if your doing a 1:13 ratio then it doesn't matter anyways because
I don't believe spares can cross shelfs.
Steve Evans
Computing Services
(619) 594-0653