Fwiw, what
we’ve done at my company for some of those sets of data that just aren’t *worthy* of being put on a Netapp, is we’ve
also picked up some SNAP servers.
They’re basically a cheaper lower-end version of Netapps. (A *lot*
cheaper, unfortunately, as now I often have to defend why we need to upgrade
the netapp rather than “just buy a few more SNAP servers”.) They don’t seem to scale nearly as well
as the netapps in terms of performance when there are many concurrent users,
but for lower-end storage we’ve been fairly successful with them so far.
I think
there are several of these low-end appliance solutions on the market now. Snap is just the one we’ve had
experience with here.
--
Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator -
Remedy, a BMC Software Company