Keep in mind the space limitations of LUN's. I am just reminding the list.
 
As performance goes, I would suggest getting a baseline on Cifs and see the difference on ISCSI. It can be drastic at the protocol, but the Filer needs to be ready for the performance internals. It can be a LOT of net traffic when you actually open up the GigE's for top performance.
 
Rich
 
 

From: Victor Olsen [mailto:victor.olsen@proact.no]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:47 PM
To: 'Dirk Seidel'; toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Oracle on CIFS?

We have a customer running 2 x 8.1.7 and 2 x 9.x oracle databases on a F820.
In addition they are running 1 x informix, 1 x MSSQL2K and 1 x domino database on the same filer.
No problem at all.
Oracle supports UNC path for filenames, so you don't even have to map the drive.
The customer has never complained about performance.
 
If you don't like UNCpaths, you probable should consider iSCSI.
You will get a drive that windows treats like a local drive and performance might be a bit higher.
 
 
Victor
-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de]
Sent: 26. februar 2004 00:42
To: toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: Oracle on CIFS?

Hi out there,
 
has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN.
What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share?
 
Thank You!
 
Dirk